Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review.
Journal Information
Full Title: Adm Policy Ment Health
Abbreviation: Adm Policy Ment Health
Country: Unknown
Publisher: Unknown
Language: N/A
Publication Details
Subject Category: Health Services
Available in Europe PMC: Yes
Available in PMC: Yes
PDF Available: No
Related Papers from Same Journal
Transparency Score
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence textCore Indicators
"Other Sources of Bias Finally, 18 (56 %) studies reported other potential sources of bias, where the most common reason (n = 14, 44 %) was a small sample size (Ashaye et al. 2003; Copeland 2007; Galvinhill 2001; Lester, 2012; Murphy et al. 2012; Probst et al. 2013; Reese et al. 2009a, b; Rise et al. 2012; Schmidt et al. 2006; Simon et al. 2013; Soeken et al. 1981; Trudeau 2000; Truitt 2011)."
"This is an independent report commissioned and funded by the Policy Research Programme in the Department of Health. The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Department. The Child Policy Research Unit (CPRU) is funded by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme. The authors thank the members of CPRU: Terence Stephenson, Catherine Law, Amanda Edwards, Ruth Gilbert, Steve Morris, Helen Roberts, Cathy Street and Russell Viner."
Additional Indicators
Assessment Info
Tool: rtransparent
OST Version: N/A
Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025