Cardiac biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:
Jayasimhan D; Foster S; Chang CL; Hancox RJ.

Journal:
J Intensive Care

Publication Year: 2021

DOI:
10.1186/s40560-021-00548-6

PMCID:
PMC8072305

PMID:
33902707

View on PubMed View on PMC View Publisher
Journal Information

Full Title: J Intensive Care

Abbreviation: J Intensive Care

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Critical Care Medicine

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Related Papers from Same Journal
Chest CT findings in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring V-V ECMO: J-CARVE registr…
Nishikimi M; Ohshimo S; Fukumoto W and 31 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 4/6
Efficacy of permissive underfeeding for critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and t…
Yue HY; Peng W; Zeng J and 3 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 4/6
External validation of the HACOR score and ROX index for predicting treatment failure in patients w…
Okano H; Yamamoto R; Iwasaki Y and 10 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 4/6
From bedside to recovery: exercise therapy for prevention of post-intensive care syndrome.
Liu K; Tronstad O; Flaws D and 4 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 3/6
Limitation of life sustaining measures in neurocritical care: sex, timing, and advance directive.
Bögli SY; Stretti F; Utebay D and 3 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 3/6
View All Papers from This Journal
Transparency Score
4/6
66.7% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participateNot applicable Consent for publicationNot applicable Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests."

Evidence found in paper:

"Funding The authors received no funding for this systematic review."

Evidence found in paper:

"We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis for Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statements in conducting and reporting this systematic review and meta-analysis []. Our protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020154072)."

Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025