Time to intubation with McGrath ™ videolaryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope in powered air-purifying respirator: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:
Goh QY; Lie SA; Tan Z; Tan PYB; Ng SY and 1 more

Journal:
Singapore Med J

Publication Year: 2021

DOI:
10.11622/smedj.2021165

PMCID:
PMC10863731

PMID:
34688229

Journal Information

Full Title: Singapore Med J

Abbreviation: Singapore Med J

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Medicine

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
3/6
0.0% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest."

Evidence found in paper:

"Financial support and sponsorship The study was funded by Singapore General Hospital Division of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine COVID-19 Funding."

Evidence found in paper:

"This study is a non-blinded randomised clinical trial conducted in Singapore General Hospital, a tertiary acute care academic hospital, from June 2020 to July 2020. The SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board granted ethical approval (IRB Ref.: 2020/2329) for this study on 30 April 2020. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT04424953). Study team members obtained signed written informed consent from participants during their assessment in the Preanaesthesia Assessment Clinic. The attending anaesthetists provided signed written consent before induction of anaesthesia."

Open Access
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025