Body position for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia for critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Journal Information

Full Title: J Intensive Care

Abbreviation: J Intensive Care

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Critical Care Medicine

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
4/6
66.7% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations Ethical approval and consent to participateNot applicable. Consent for publicationNot applicable. Competing interestsThe authors declare do not have competing interests. Competing interests The authors declare do not have competing interests."

Evidence found in paper:

"Funding This research was funded by a grant from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) [Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), (DOCM 27/01/2021)]."

Evidence found in paper:

"This NMA was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews—PROSPERO (CRD42021247547). In addition, this study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Network-Meta-analyses (PRISMA–NMA) [], and we also followed the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions []. Conclusions: Cautiously, semi-recumbent seems to be the best position to reduce VAP incidence, hospital length of stay and the duration of MV. Prone is the most effective position to reduce the risk of mortality and the ICU length of stay, but it showed no effect on the VAP incidence.: Registration PROSPERO CRD42021247547"

Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025