Compensatory mechanisms from different exercise intensities in type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of a 1-year randomized controlled trial.

"Declarations Conflict of interestThe authors report there are no conflicts of interest to declare. Ethical standard statementThe study was approved by the Ethics Council of the Associação Protetora dos Diabéticos de Portugal (Approval Number: 07/17/2013) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki for Human Studies [35]. Informed consentWritten informed consent was obtained from all participants before proceeding with any protocol-specific procedures. Conflict of interest The authors report there are no conflicts of interest to declare."

"Funding Open access funding provided by FCT|FCCN (b-on). This work was conducted at the Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance (CIPER), unit I&D 447 (UIDB/00447/2020), Faculty of Human Kinetics of the University of Lisbon, and supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, the Portuguese Ministry of Science. IRC, JPM, and PBJ are supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (IRC: SFRH/BD/149394/2019; JPM: SFRH/BD/ 85742/2012; PBJ: SFRH/BPD/115977/2016; GBR: 2020.07856.BD,2020), and DHN is supported by a grant from Comité Olímpico de Portugal (doctoral scholarship—COP)."

"Conclusions: Both MICT and HIIT did not result in any compensatory changes in estimated NEAT and NEPA with the intervention on non-training days. Moreover, no changes in estimated NEAT and NEPA were found when categorizing our participants as low-responders and high-responders to FM and BW when compared to controls.: Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov ID.: NCT03144505."