Effectiveness of Internet-based cognitive-behavioural therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD-NET) and body dysmorphic disorder (BDD-NET) in the Swedish public health system using the RE-AIM implementation framework.

"the study was approved by the regional ethics board of stockholm (repn dnr 2018/2550-32) and the methods were pre-registered at open science framework (osf) before data analysis began ( https://osf io/rkpgu/ ) 2 1 all consecutive referrals to the clinic that started ocd-net or bdd-net were included in the study and there were no other inclusion or exclusion criteria related to study participation."

"Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Prof. Mataix-Cols receives royalties for contributing articles to UpToDate, Wolters Kluwer Health, outside of the submitted work. Prof. Rück has received book royalties from Natur & Kultur, Studentlitteratur and Albert Bonniers Förlag and various speakers fees all unrelated to the submitted work. Dr Andersson receives royalties from Natur & Kultur for a self-help book on health anxiety Dr Flygare has received speaking fees from the Swedish OCD Association, Insight Events AB, and Kry International AB, as well as reimbursement for writing articles for Inside Practice Psychiatry, all outside the submitted work. Dr Enander has no competing interests to declare. Dr Radu has no competing interests to declare. Dr Ivanova has no competing interests to declare. MD Chen has no competing interests to declare."

"Funding and role of funder This study was supported by the 10.13039/501100004359Swedish Research Council [2021-00898], the 10.13039/501100006636Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2021-00132], Center for Innovative Medicine – CIMED, and the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research between 10.13039/501100004348Stockholm County Council and 10.13039/501100004047Karolinska Institutet. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication."