Evaluation of four laboratory-based high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 automated antigen tests compared to RT-PCR on nasal and oropharyngeal samples.

Journal Information

Full Title: J Clin Virol

Abbreviation: J Clin Virol

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Virology

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
4/6
66.7% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Evidence found in paper:

"the full data set for the analytical evaluation and clinical evaluation of the four aat can be downloaded from: https://doi org/10 6084/m9 figshare 21769280 and https://doi org/10 6084/m9 figshare 21769310 2 8 the participating commercial companies had no influence on study design sample collection analysis interpretation or drafting the manuscript nor decision on publishing 3 3 1 in the retrospective part of the study a total of 304 samples (100 rt-pcr negative samples and 204 rt-pcr positive samples) were included."

Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declaration of Competing Interest None of the authors have any personal conflict of interests to report. The project received a participation fee from each of the participating companies to cover the cost of the project."

Evidence found in paper:

"Funding The study was funded by a participant fee for each test and by the Danish Regions."

Protocol Registration
Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025