Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurological Deficit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal Information

Full Title: Global Spine J

Abbreviation: Global Spine J

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Orthopedics

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
4/6
66.7% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article."

Evidence found in paper:

"Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by Good Liver Foundation and Taiwan Brain Disease Foundation of Taiwan (MS476)."

Evidence found in paper:

"All data are available in the article and Supplementary Material. The protocol was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42021291769) on December 19, 2021, to guide the study process. Methods: We registered a protocol in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021291769) and searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Surgical and non-surgical treatments were compared in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficits. Predefined outcomes at ≥6 months included pain (defined as a visual analog scale [VAS] of 0-100), functional outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] of 0-50 and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RMDQ] of 0-24), and kyphotic angulation."

Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025