Benchmarking outcomes for distal pancreatectomy: critical evaluation of four multicenter studies.

Authors:
Müller PC; Toti JMA; Guidetti C; Kuemmerli C; Bolli M and 2 more

Journal:
Langenbecks Arch Surg

Publication Year: 2023

DOI:
10.1007/s00423-023-02972-8

PMCID:
PMC10310555

PMID:
37386208

View on PubMed View on PMC View Publisher
Journal Information

Full Title: Langenbecks Arch Surg

Abbreviation: Langenbecks Arch Surg

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: General Surgery

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Related Papers from Same Journal
Anomalies of the right hepatic artery in periampullary cancer treatment: are pathological and clini…
De Sio D; Lucinato C; Panza E and 11 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 3/6
Approach to concurrent inguinal hernias during laparoscopic appendectomy for early appendicitis.
Dayı S; Anayurt M; Çınar F and 2 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 3/6
Endoscopic and surgical treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis-a comparison of short- and long-term …
Timmermann L; Schönauer S; Hillebrandt KH and 4 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 3/6
Management of groin hernias in emergency setting: differences in indications and outcomes between l…
Sbacco V; Petrucciani N; Lauteri G and 4 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 3/6
Management of intraoperatively identified small bile duct stones in patients undergoing cholecystec…
Bunting D; Adesuyi A; Findlay J and 2 more (2024) - Transparency Score: 2/6
View All Papers from This Journal
Transparency Score
3/6
50.0% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approvalAll procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Consent to participateNot applicable due to the nature of the study design. Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests."

Evidence found in paper:

"Funding Open access funding provided by University of Basel The study was funded by institutional means."

Protocol Registration
Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025