Measures of perceived mobility ability in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of psychometric properties.

Authors:
Beauchamp M; Hao Q; Kuspinar A; Alder G; Makino K and 6 more

Journal:
Age Ageing

Publication Year: 2023

DOI:
10.1093/ageing/afad124

PMCID:
PMC10615037

PMID:
37902516

Journal Information

Full Title: Age Ageing

Abbreviation: Age Ageing

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Geriatrics

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
3/6
50.0% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declaration of Conflicts of Interest M.B. holds a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Mobility, Ageing, and Chronic Disease. P.R. holds the Raymond and Margaret Labarge Chair in Research and Knowledge, is the Director of the McMaster Institute for Research on Ageing and the Labarge Centre for Mobility in Ageing, and holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Geroscience."

Funding Disclosure
Evidence found in paper:

"This review focuses on self-report measures of perceived mobility for older community-dwelling adults. We registered the review protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022306689). The WHO World Report on Ageing and Health describes the ability to be mobile as ‘movement in all its forms by the body (with or without an assistive device) and/or a vehicle’ and proposes the following sub-domains: getting up from a chair or moving from a bed to a chair, walking for leisure, exercising, completing daily tasks, driving a car and/or using public transportation [, ]. We used this definition of ability to be mobile to identify eligible measures. If a measure included both mobility- and non-mobility-related items, we only included the measure if 80% or more of the items were related to mobility or if it had a sub-domain solely related to the mobility construct. Methods: We registered the review protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022306689) and included studies that examined the psychometric properties of perceived mobility measures in community-dwelling older adults. Five databases were searched to identify potentially relevant primary studies. We qualitatively summarised psychometric property estimates and related operational frameworks. We conducted risk of bias and overall quality assessments, and meta-analyses when at least three studies were included for a particular outcome. The synthesised results were compared against the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments criteria for good measurement properties."

Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025