Increasing efficiency and well-being? a systematic review of the empirical claims of the double-benefit argument in socially assistive devices.
Journal Information
Full Title: BMC Med Ethics
Abbreviation: BMC Med Ethics
Country: Unknown
Publisher: Unknown
Language: N/A
Publication Details
Related Papers from Same Journal
Transparency Score
3/6
50.0% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence textCore Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
COI Disclosure
Evidence found in paper:
"Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participateThis study does not involve gathering of primary data. No ethical approval is required. Consent for publicationNot applicable. Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests."
Funding Disclosure
Evidence found in paper:
"Funding This study was funded by FoRUM Forschungsförderung, Ruhr-University Bochum (Grant No. F987-2020) and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (Grant No. 491466077) Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL."
Protocol Registration
Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info
Tool: rtransparent
OST Version: N/A
Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025