Economic evaluation of percutaneous cryoablation vs conventional surgery in extra-abdominal desmoid tumours in the Spanish healthcare system.

Publication Year: 2024

DOI:
10.1186/s13244-023-01580-w

PMCID:
PMC10772037

PMID:
38185710

Journal Information

Full Title: Insights Imaging

Abbreviation: Insights Imaging

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
3/6
50.0% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participateThis analysis required the access to patient data at the hospital level related to APR-DRG codification. The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Bellvitge University Hospital reviewed and approved the protocol for access to APR-DRG. Patient consent to participate was not required. Consent for publicationNot applicable. Competing interestsThis analysis was developed with unrestricted financial support from Boston Scientific. IO and NT are employees of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), a consultant company specialising in health technology assessment, which has received financial support from Boston Scientific to conduct the development of the present work. JAN, DB and RGM declare proctoring in cryoablation for Boston Scientific. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests. Competing interests This analysis was developed with unrestricted financial support from Boston Scientific. IO and NT are employees of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), a consultant company specialising in health technology assessment, which has received financial support from Boston Scientific to conduct the development of the present work. JAN, DB and RGM declare proctoring in cryoablation for Boston Scientific. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests."

Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations: Ethics approval and consent to participateThis analysis required the access to patient data at the hospital level related to APR-DRG codification. The Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Bellvitge University Hospital reviewed and approved the protocol for access to APR-DRG. Patient consent to participate was not required.: Consent for publicationNot applicable.: Competing interestsThis analysis was developed with unrestricted financial support from Boston Scientific. IO and NT are employees of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), a consultant company specialising in health technology assessment, which has received financial support from Boston Scientific to conduct the development of the present work. JAN, DB and RGM declare proctoring in cryoablation for Boston Scientific. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests. Competing interests: This analysis was developed with unrestricted financial support from Boston Scientific. IO and NT are employees of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), a consultant company specialising in health technology assessment, which has received financial support from Boston Scientific to conduct the development of the present work. JAN, DB and RGM declare proctoring in cryoablation for Boston Scientific. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests."

Protocol Registration
Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025