Visual performance and patient preference with bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus or combined implantation of an extended depth of focus/trifocal intraocular lens.

Journal Information

Full Title: Int Ophthalmol

Abbreviation: Int Ophthalmol

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Ophthalmology

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
4/6
66.7% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations Conflict of interestFK, JM, and JO have received research support from Carl Zeiss Meditec, AG. FK and JM have received speaker and consultant honoraria from Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. FK has also served on advisory boards for Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. Conflict of interest FK, JM, and JO have received research support from Carl Zeiss Meditec, AG. FK and JM have received speaker and consultant honoraria from Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. FK has also served on advisory boards for Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc."

Evidence found in paper:

"Funding This study was sponsored and funded by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., USA."

Evidence found in paper:

"This study was carried out in compliance with EN ISO 14155:2012-01 Clinical Investigation of Medical Devices for Human Subjects, German Medical device law (Medical Devices Act—MPG) §23 b, MPSV—Ordinance on the Registration, Evaluation and Prevention of Risks of Medical Devices (Medical Devices Safety Plan Ordinance). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethics principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients provided informed consent. The study was approved by all local ethics committees and was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT05462067). Methods: Multicentered, comparative, open-label, retrospective/prospective study. Post-IOL implantation, patients were prospectively enrolled into this study; preoperative patient data were collected retrospectively. Follow-up was at 2–4 and 5–8 months post-surgery. The primary endpoint was binocular best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). The study was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT05462067)."

Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025