Assessment of women's needs, wishes and preferences regarding interprofessional guidance on nutrition in pregnancy - a qualitative study.

Authors:
Ebinghaus M; Agricola CJ; Schmittinger J; Makarova N; Zyriax BC.

Journal:
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

Publication Year: 2024

DOI:
10.1186/s12884-024-06351-z

PMCID:
PMC10880225

PMID:
38383376

Journal Information

Journal Title: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth

Detailed journal information not available.

Publication Details

Subject Category: Obstetrics & Gynecology

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
4/6
66.7% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participateThe study was approved by the Local Psychological Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (LPEK-0507) and registered at OSF 12.09.2022 (10.17605/OSF.IO/YP7BR). The interviewer explained the purposes of the research, voluntary participation, confidentiality of records, and that the participants may stop the interview at any time (see Supplement S1 and S2). Following participant’s approval to be involved in audio-recorded focus groups and interviews, their informed consent was also obtained. Privacy and confidentiality of all study information was maintained. All methods were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Consent for publicationNot applicable. Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests."

Evidence found in paper:

"Funding This research received no external funding. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL."

Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations: Ethics approval and consent to participateThe study was approved by the Local Psychological Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (LPEK-0507) and registered at OSF 12.09.2022 (10.17605/OSF.IO/YP7BR). The interviewer explained the purposes of the research, voluntary participation, confidentiality of records, and that the participants may stop the interview at any time (see Supplement S1 and S2). Following participant’s approval to be involved in audio-recorded focus groups and interviews, their informed consent was also obtained. Privacy and confidentiality of all study information was maintained. All methods were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.: Consent for publicationNot applicable.: Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was approved by the Local Psychological Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (LPEK-0507) and registered at OSF 12.09.2022 (10.17605/OSF.IO/YP7BR). The interviewer explained the purposes of the research, voluntary participation, confidentiality of records, and that the participants may stop the interview at any time (see Supplement S1 and S2). Following participant’s approval to be involved in audio-recorded focus groups and interviews, their informed consent was also obtained. Privacy and confidentiality of all study information was maintained. All methods were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations."

Open Access
Paper is freely available to read
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025