Implementation of an Evidence-Based Intervention with Safety Net Clinics to Improve Mammography Appointment Adherence Among Underserved Women.

Authors:
Holcomb J; Rajan SS; Ferguson GM; Sun J; Walton GH and 1 more

Journal:
J Cancer Educ

Publication Year: 2021

DOI:
10.1007/s13187-021-02116-w

PMCID:
PMC9852109

PMID:
34822118

Journal Information

Full Title: J Cancer Educ

Abbreviation: J Cancer Educ

Country: Unknown

Publisher: Unknown

Language: N/A

Publication Details

Subject Category: Education

Available in Europe PMC: Yes

Available in PMC: Yes

PDF Available: No

Transparency Score
3/6
0.0% Transparent
Transparency Indicators
Click on green indicators to view evidence text
Core Indicators
Data Sharing
Code Sharing
Evidence found in paper:

"Declarations Ethics Approval and Consent to participateThe study received IRB approval from the Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth). Consent for PublicationNot applicable. Conflict of InterestThe authors declare no competing interests. Conflict of Interest The authors declare no competing interests."

Evidence found in paper:

"Funding Funding for this study is provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (Grant number: 1R18HS023255-01)."

Evidence found in paper:

"The Peace of Mind Program is an evidence-based intervention to improve mammography appointment adherence in underserved women. The aim of this study was to assess effectiveness of the intervention and implementation of the intervention in safety net clinics. The intervention was implemented through a non-randomized stepped wedge cluster hybrid study design with 19 Federally Qualified Health Centers and charity care clinics within the Greater Houston area. A multivariable generalized estimating equation logistic regression was conducted to examine mammography appointment adherence. A survey assessing Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs was also conducted with clinic staff prior to adoption and eight weeks post implementation. One-sided t -tests were conducted to analyze mean score changes between the surveys. A total of 4402 women (baseline period = 2078; intervention period = 2324) were included in the final regression analysis. Women in the intervention period were more likely to attend or reschedule their mammography appointment (OR = 1.30; p  < 0.01) than those in the baseline period receiving usual care. Women who completed the intervention were more likely to attend or reschedule their mammography appointment than those who did not complete the intervention (OR = 1.62; p  < 0.01). The mammography appointment no-show rates for those in the baseline period, in the intervention period, and who completed the intervention were, respectively, 22%, 19%, and 15%. A total of 15 clinics prior to adoption and eight clinics completed the survey at 8 weeks post implementation A statistically significant mean score decrease was observed in Inner Setting and in two Inner Setting CFIR constructs, Culture–Effort, and Implementation Climate. While the intervention improved mammography appointment adherence, there are opportunities to further integrate Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs. Trial registration : Clinical trials registration number: NCT02296177."

Open Access
Additional Indicators
Replication
Novelty Statement
Assessment Info

Tool: rtransparent

OST Version: N/A

Last Updated: Aug 05, 2025